ExxonMobil Global Services Company et al v. Gensym Corporation et al
| ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company, ExxonMobil Global Services Company and ExxonMobil Corporation |
| Versata Enterprises, Inc., Gensym Corporation and ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company |
| Intelligent Laboratory Solutions, Inc. |
| Gensym Corporation |
| ExxonMobil Global Services Company and Exxon Mobil Corporation |
| 1:2012cv00442 |
| May 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Austin Office |
| John D. Rainey |
| Copyright |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
103
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 85 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge John D. Rainey. (kkc)
|
|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, GRANTING 61 Motion to Dismiss ExxonMobil's Alter Ego Theory. ExxonMobil is granted leave to amend its complaint no later than 14 days after entry of this Order, or this claim will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge John D. Rainey. (kkc)
|
|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, DENYING 36 MOTION to Dismiss Gensym's Second Amended Counterclaim. Signed by Judge John D. Rainey. (kkc)
|
|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 11 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge John D. Rainey. (kkc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
