WorkSTEPS, Inc. v. ErgoScience, Inc. et al
| WorkSTEPS, Inc. |
| Does (1-300), ErgoScience, Inc. and Deborah E. Lechner |
| 1:2014cv00968 |
| October 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Austin Office |
| Sam Sparks |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER GRANTING 47 Motion for Partial Reconsideration re 43 Order on Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document, Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; FURTHER ORDERED that the Court's April 20, 2015 Order [#43] is VACATED IN PART as described in this opinion; GRANTING 49 Motion for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration; DENYING 55 Motion to Consolidate Cases; GRANTING 56 Motion to Amend Complaint; GRANTING 57 Motion for Extension of Time to Extend Response Deadlines; GRANTING 64 Motion for Leave to File Surreply. Signed by Judge Sam Sparks. (td)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER GRANTING 32 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document; FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants ErgoScience, Inc. and Deborah E. Lechner's Motion to Dismiss # 8 , which this Court converts to a motion for summary judgment, is GRANTED iN PART and DENIED IN PART as described in this opinion; FINALLY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for [Partial] Summary Judgment # 32 -2 (sealed) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as described in this opinion. Signed by Judge Sam Sparks. (td)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
