United States of America v. $38,030.00, more or less, in United States Currency
| United States of America |
| $38,030.00, more or less, in United States Currency |
| 1:2014cv01002 |
| November 5, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Texas |
| Austin Office |
| Sam Sparks |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 981 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Process Receipt and Return as to the Respondent $38,030.00, more or less, in United States Currency, served on April 2, 2015 by United States of America (Castillo, Daniel) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Process Receipt and Return as to the Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, served on April 2, 2015 by United States of America (Castillo, Daniel) |
| Filing 10 DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of United States of America against $38,030.00, more or less, in United States Currency. Signed by Judge Sam Sparks. (jk) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Forfeiture of Property Final Default Judgment of Forfeiture by United States of America. (Castillo, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Process Receipt and Return as to Stephen Orr, Orr & Olavson, Attorneys at Law, served on January 28, 2015 by United States of America (Castillo, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Declaration of Publication beginning on November 13, 2014 and ending December 12, 2014 by United States of America (Castillo, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Process Receipt and Return as to Johnny Jesus Devora, served on November 19, 2014 by United States of America (Castillo, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Process Receipt and Return as to the Respondent $38,030.00, more or less, in United States currency, served on November 18, 2014 by United States of America (Castillo, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Process Receipt and Return as to the Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, served on November 18, 2014 by United States of America (Castillo, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 Warrant for Arrest of Property Issued for $38,030.00, more or less, in United States Currency. (kkc) |
Filing 2
ORDER FOR WARRANT for Arrest of Property. Signed by Judge Sam Sparks. (kkc)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE, filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Complaint for Forfeiture, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Proposed Warrant)(afd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. $38,030.00, more or less, in United States Currency | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Daniel M. Castillo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: $38,030.00, more or less, in United States Currency | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
