Luevano v. Clinton, et al
Petitioner: Jaime Luevano
Respondent: Hillary R. Clinton, High Rank U.S. Congress Officials, State Tex. Judges and U.S. Texas Judges
Case Number: 5:2015cv00142
Filed: February 24, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Texas
Office: San Antonio Office
Presiding Judge: Henry J. Bemporad
Presiding Judge: David A. Ezra
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jaime Luevano is DISMISSED as untimely; DISMISSED based upon Petitioner's failure to identify with specificity any resondent who currently possesses custody of Petitioner's person. Petitioner's claims are DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. Petitioner is DENIED a Certificate of Appealability on all his claims in this action. 8 MOTION for a copy of grievance file filed by Jaime Luevano, DENIED; 2 Applicat ion to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Jaime Luevano is DENIED; 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File filed by Jaime Luevano is DENIED. CASE NO LONGER REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Henry J. Bemporad. Petitioner shall immediately CEASE and DESIST, i.e., Petitioner is henceforth PROHIBITED, from filing, attempting to file, or submitting for filing with any federal court any legal action of any type or manner.... Signed by Judge David A. Ezra. (rg)
February 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER transferring case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 02/23/15. (SMD) (cc: Jaime Luevano) Modified text on 2/24/2015 (ALM).[Transferred from Minnesota on 2/24/2015.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Luevano v. Clinton, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Hillary R. Clinton
Represented By: AUSA - Immigration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: High Rank U.S. Congress Officials
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State Tex. Judges
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: U.S. Texas Judges
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jaime Luevano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?