Eby v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Warren Craig Eby
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 2:2008cv00584
Filed: August 5, 2008
Court: Utah District Court
Office: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County: Utah
Presiding Judge: Dee Benson
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 15, 2011 22 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM DECISION - The court SUSTAINS in part and OVERRULES in part Mr. Ebys objections to the R & R and REMANDS this action to the Commissioner for the Social Security Administration for further proceedings in line with this Order. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 2/15/2011. (jtj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eby v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Warren Craig Eby
Represented By: David W. Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.