DeYoung v. USA

Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Rulon Frederick DeYoung
Case Number: 2:2011cv00792
Filed: August 30, 2011
Court: Utah District Court
Office: Central Office
County: Salt Lake
Presiding Judge: Clark Waddoups
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28:2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 14, 2013 25 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM DECISION denying 1 Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) ; denying 4 Motion to move the court to Dismiss relief of order pursuant to FR Civ P Rule 60 with prejudice ; denying 5 Motion for relief of order pursuant to FRCP Rule 60 ; denying 9 Motion to Dismiss ; denying 13 Motion for Writ of Mandamus ; denying 15 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 08/13/2013. (asp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DeYoung v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By: D. Loren Washburn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rulon Frederick DeYoung
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.