Pengra v. Qwest Communications Company LLC
Plaintiff: Terence Pengra
Defendant: Qwest Communications Company LLC
Case Number: 2:2011cv01034
Filed: November 10, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Utah
Office: Central Office
County: Wasatch
Presiding Judge: Ted Stewart
Nature of Suit: Labor/Management Relations
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM DECISION granting 13 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 07/06/2012. (tls)
March 8, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM DECISION granting in part and denying in part 2 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 03/08/2012. (asp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pengra v. Qwest Communications Company LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terence Pengra
Represented By: David J. Holdsworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Qwest Communications Company LLC
Represented By: Scott M. Petersen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?