Washington County et al v. USA et al
| Washington County and State of Utah |
| USA, United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service and United States Bureau of Land Management |
| 2:2012cv00471 |
| May 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Washington |
| Tena Campbell |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2409 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
137
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING SUWA'S FIFTH MOTION TO INTERVENE AS OF RIGHT and RETAINING FOURTH AMENDED PERMISSIVE INTERVENTION ORDER - For the reasons stated above, the court DENIES SUWA's motion to intervene as of right (ECF No. 607) in Kane County (2). The Fourth Amended Permissive Intervention Order shall remain in place in all cases to which it presently applies. In the event there is any question, the court informs SUWA that if it wishes to appeal this decision, the Fourth Amended Permissive Intervention Order does not preclude SUWA from filing the requisite Notice of Interlocutory Appeal. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 6/6/22. (jrj)
|
|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion to Intervene; granting 60 Motion for Leave to File supplemental exhibit. Signed by Judge Clark Waddoups on 6/12/13 (alt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
