LeBlanc v. C.R. England Inc et,al

Defendant: Jeffrey Price and C R England Inc
Plaintiff: Taynereon LeBlanc
Case Number: 2:2013cv00766
Filed: August 14, 2013
Court: Utah District Court
Office: Central Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Dee Benson
Nature of Suit: Federal Employer's Liability
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LeBlanc v. C.R. England Inc et,al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey Price
Represented By: Scott A. Hagen
Represented By: Liesel B. Stevens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C R England Inc
Represented By: Scott A. Hagen
Represented By: Liesel B. Stevens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Taynereon LeBlanc
Represented By: Andrew G. Deiss
Represented By: Daryl K. Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.