Murata Machinery USA et al v. Daifuku et al
| Murata Machinery USA and Murata Machinery |
| Daifuku and Daifuku America |
| 2:2013cv00866 |
| September 23, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| Dustin B. Pead |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
278
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 257 SEALED MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Murata Machinery, Murata Machinery USA. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 8/15/2016. (eat)
|
|
Filing
268
ORDER re 264 MOTION for Protective Order and Memorandum in Support to Enforce Court's Stay Order filed by Daifuku America, Daifuku, 257 *SEALED DOCUMENT* SEALED MOTION and Memorandum in Support filed by Murata Machinery, Murata Machinery USA, 171 MOTION to Lift the Stay on Prosecution of Additional Claims in the Amended Complaint and Memorandum in Support filed by Murata Machinery, Murata Machinery USA. IT IS HERE BY ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Lift Stayon the Prosecution of Additional Claims [Docket No. 171 ] is DENIED. Because the case hasbeen and will continue to be stayed, the court will not consider Plaintiffs Motion forPreliminary Injunction [Docket No. 257 ] at this time, and it is therefore DENIED without prejudice to renew at a later date, if appropriate. Defendants Motion for Protective Order[Docket No. 264 ] is DENIED as moot.Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 9/4/2015. (jwt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
