Todd v. Garden et al
| Shayne Todd |
| Richard Garden, Jason Jackman and Bruce Burnham |
| 2:2014cv00453 |
| June 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Utah |
| Central Office |
| Salt Lake |
| David Nuffer |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER denying 32 Motion for TRO; denying 33 Motion for Default Judgment; denying 37 Motion for copies of case free of charge; denying 22 Motion for an In Rem Action on Defendant Jason Jackman, individually and Memorandum i n Support; denying 25 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 25 Motion for Protective Order; denying 28 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 30 Motion directing defendant to answer complaint; denying 32 Motion for Preliminary Injunc tion. The Clerk of Court shall take note that no further motions for appointed counsel will be accepted by the Court. Within fourteen days, Defendants shall file with the Court a proposed order--with analysis and conclusions--based on their 23 motion to dismiss. Plaintiff shall respond to the Proposed Order within fourteen days of filing of the proposed order. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 7/29/2016. (jwt)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER REQUIRING SERVICE OF PROCESS: It is hereby ordered that: USMS shall serve a completed summons, a copy of the Complaint and a copy of this Order upon the remaining above listed dts. See order for details. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 11/30/2015. (kpf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
