Jones v. Herbert et al
Michael Anthony Jones |
Gary R. Herbert, Jesse Gallegos, Tena Campbell, Cory Hutchings and Board of Pardons and Parole |
2:2015cv00041 |
January 22, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Utah |
Central Office |
Sevier |
Robert J. Shelby |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER: It is hereby ordered that Plaintiffs action is DISMISSED under 1915(e)(2)(B)because his claims are either frivolous or fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This case is closed. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 11/20/2017. (kpf) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER: Plaintiff must within thirty days cure the Complaint's deficiencies noted above. The Clerk's Office shall mail Plaintiff a copy of the Pro Se Litigant Guide with a form complaint and habeas pe tition for Plaintiff to use should be choose to file another amended complaint or a habeas corpus petition. The Clerk's Office shall mail Plaintiff a copy of the Pro Se Litigant Guide with a form complaint and habeas petition for Plaintiff to us e should he choose to file another amended complaint or a habeas corpus petition. If Plaintiff fails to timely cure the above deficiencies according to this Order's instructions, this action will be dismissed without further notice. Signed by Judge Robert J. Shelby on 04/17/2017. (kpf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Utah District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.