Barron v. Pallito et al
David Wayne Barron |
Andrew Pallito, Prison Health Services, Inc., Delores Burroughs-Biron, Dr. Ballard, Dr. Weischedel, Randy Porter, Theresa Stone, Carol Callea, Isenor, Kevin Jenkins, Jody Berrier and Mark Matcher |
1:2009cv00209 |
September 10, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Vermont |
Brattleboro Office |
Chittenden |
John M. Conroy |
J. Garvan Murtha |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 91 ORDER: 90 Second Motion for Final Judgment DENIED. Dfts Pallito, Stone, Porter, Barriere and Jenkins to answer 61 Second Amended Complaint not later than 12/9/2011. Claims against dfts Ballard and MHMI DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by District Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 11/18/2011. (kak) |
Filing 86 ORDER AFFIRMING, APPROVING and ADOPTING 85 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 73 Motion for Judgment, Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 74 Motion for Emergency Injunction are DENIED. Defendants Dr. Ballard and Mental Health Management, Inc.'s 75 Second Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff is granted leave to replead his claims against these two Defendants within 30 days. Defendants Andrew Pallito, in his official capacity, Theresa Stone, Randy Porter, Jodi Barriere are directed to answer the Second Amended Complaint within 20 days of this Order. It is further certified that any appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order would not be taken in good faith because such an appeal would be frivolous. This matter is returned to Magistrate Judge John M. Conroy for further proceedings. Signed by District Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 6/23/2011. (hbc) |
Filing 70 ORDER AFFIRMING, APPROVING and ADOPTING 44 Report and Recommendation. 22 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. 47 Motion for Final Judgment is DENIED. 57 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED to the extent that individual capacity claims aga inst defendant Andrew Pallito are DISMISSED; the motion is otherwise DENIED.This matter returned to Magistrate John M. Conroy. It is further certified that any appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order would not be taken in good faith because such an appeal would be frivolous. Signed by Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 9/23/2010. (kak) |
Filing 48 ORDER Affirming, Approving and Adopting 44 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. Dft Weischedel's 38 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Pltf shall be allowed 20 days to amend his claims against Dr. Weischedel. Dft Hatcher's 33 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. This matter is returned to Magistrate Judge John M. Conroy for further proceedings. Signed by Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 5/28/2010. (kak) |
Filing 43 ORDER AFFIRMING, APPROVING and ADOPTING 32 Magistrate Judge's REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Dfts' 11 , 16 , 27 and 29 Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED. Pltf shall file an amended complaint on or before 5/17/2010. 3 Motion for Prelimi nary Injunctive Relief is DENIED without prejudice. As to 22 Pltf's second Motion for Injunctive Relief, all dfts shall, within 14 days after responding to the amended complaint, file a memorandum showing cause why the motion should not be gra nted. All claims against dfts Mark Hatcher, Carol Callea and Isenor are DISMISSED. This matter is returned to Magistrate Judge John M. Conroy for further proceedings. It is further certified that any appeal taken in forma pauperis from this Order would not be taken in good faith because such an appeal would be frivolous. Signed by Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 4/2/2010. (kak) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.