Dole v. Adams et al
Plaintiff: C. Minot Dole
Defendant: Jacob Carroll and William Adams
Case Number: 1:2012cv00024
Filed: February 3, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Vermont
Office: Brattleboro Office
County: Chittenden
Presiding Judge: J. Garvan Murtha
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 120 DECISION AND ORDER on the Merits of 2 Amended Complaint; denying as moot 104 MOTION for Judgment on Partial Findings, 116 MOTION to Continue Objection to Testimony and Admission of Exhibits Related to Mitigation of Damages. Judgment found in favor of the Defendant as to each of Plaintiff's claims. Signed by District Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 1/29/2016. (esb)
July 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 90 RULING denying 82 Motion for Reconsideration re 79 Ruling on Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings or, Alternatively, Partial Summary Judgment; denying 83 Motion to Amend/Correct. A Bench Trial is scheduled for 9/22/2015 to 9/25/2015, pursuant to 89 . The parties proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law and joint trial memorandum shall be filed by 8/28/2015, pursuant to 81 . Signed by District Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 7/22/2015. (esb)
May 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 79 RULING on Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings or, Alternatively, Partial Summary Judgment: GRANTED 70 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on the Pleadings, DENIED as moot, Or in the alternative, MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment. Dole� 39;s claim under the Vermont Consumer Fraud Act is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Bench Trial set for 9/14/2015 09:30 AM in Brattleboro Courtroom before District Judge J. Garvan Murtha. Signed by District Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 5/11/2015. (esb)
February 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 69 RULING denying 59 Motion to Change Venue. Signed by District Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 2/10/2015. (esb)
November 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER denying 26 Motion for Order to Deem Admitted Each Request to Admit Served by Plaintiff Upon Defendant Adams on 5/12/2012. Counsel shall file, no later than November 27, 2013, a proper certificate showing service of 27 Motion for Dismissa l upon Jacob Carroll. Failure to do so will result in denial of the motion without prejudice. Either party may move for an extension of the dispositive motion deadline by 12/6/2013. Parties to inform the Court of a date for ENE no later than 12/13/2013. Signed by District Judge J. Garvan Murtha on 11/18/2013. (kak)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dole v. Adams et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: C. Minot Dole
Represented By: Robert E. Manchester, Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jacob Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?