Langlais v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Plaintiff: Carol A. Langlais
Case Number: 2:2011cv00284
Filed: November 22, 2011
Court: Vermont District Court
Office: Burlington Office
County: Chittenden
Referring Judge: John M. Conroy
Presiding Judge: William K. Sessions
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:0405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 2, 2012 8 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION denying 3 Motion to Reverse the Commissioner's Decision and Remand for Further Proceedings and granting 6 Motion to Affirm the Decision of the Commissioner. Signed by Judge William K. Sessions III on 10/2/2012. (law)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Langlais v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carol A. Langlais
Represented By: Anthony B. Lamb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.