Ottinger v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Plaintiff: Kathryn Ottinger
Defendant: Health and Human Services, Secretary of
Case Number: 2:2012cv00002
Filed: January 6, 2012
Court: Vermont District Court
Office: Burlington Office
County: Chittenden
Referring Judge: John M. Conroy
Presiding Judge: William K. Sessions
Nature of Suit: Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action: 42:1395
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 28, 2012 12 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DENIES Plaintiff's 6 MOTION to Reverse Decision of the Secretary and GRANTS Defendant's 7 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge John M. Conroy on 11/28/2012. (hbc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ottinger v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathryn Ottinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Health and Human Services, Secretary of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.