Lasitter v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Plaintiff: Sharon Lasitter
Case Number: 2:2012cv00112
Filed: May 25, 2012
Court: Vermont District Court
Office: Burlington Office
County: Washington
Referring Judge: John M. Conroy
Presiding Judge: William K. Sessions
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:0405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 30, 2013 11 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER: The Court DENIES Plaintiff's 6 MOTION to Reverse the Commissioner's Decision and GRANTS Defendant's 10 MOTION for Order Affirming the Commissioner's Decision. Signed by Judge John M. Conroy on 1/30/2013. (hbc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lasitter v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharon Lasitter
Represented By: Craig A. Jarvis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.