Barbour v. Attorney General of Virginia

Plaintiff: Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant: Attorney General of Virginia
Case Number: 5:2012cv00134
Filed: June 14, 2012
Court: Vermont District Court
Office: Rutland Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge: John M. Conroy
Presiding Judge: Christina Reiss
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 14, 2012 4 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION denying 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, and dismissing without prejudice the complaint. If Plaintiff pays the required $350 filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, his complaint shall be reinstated. Signed by Chief Judge Christina Reiss on 8/14/2012. (pam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barbour v. Attorney General of Virginia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Edward Barbour
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Attorney General of Virginia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.