Exelixis, Inc. v. Lee
Exelixis, Inc. |
Honorable David J. Kappos |
1:2012cv00574 |
May 29, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Alexandria Office |
Out of State |
Leonie M. Brinkema |
Thomas Rawles Jones |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION in re 16 Motion for Summary Judgment and 13 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 01/28/2013. (jlan) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Exelixis, Inc. v. Lee | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Exelixis, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Houda Morad |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Honorable David J. Kappos | |
Represented By: | Julie Ann Edelstein |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.