Davenport v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Sherry L. Davenport
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 1:2012cv01315
Filed: November 16, 2012
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Fairfax
Referring Judge: John F. Anderson
Presiding Judge: Leonie M. Brinkema
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 20, 2013 23 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that the Court will adopt the magistrate judge's 19 Report and Recommendations in its entirety; the pltf's 20 Objection is OVERRULED, pltf's 11 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED, deft's 12 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; Judgment in the amount of $10,215.00 be and is entered in deft's favor (see Order for details). Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 05/17/13. (pmil)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davenport v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherry L. Davenport
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.