Promontory Interfinancial Network, LLC v. Anova Financial Corporation

Defendant: Anova Financial Corporation
Plaintiff: Promontory Interfinancial Network, LLC
Case Number: 2:2013cv00243
Filed: April 30, 2013
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Office: Norfolk Office
County: Arlington
Presiding Judge: Mark S. Davis
Referring Judge: Douglas E. Miller
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 24, 2014 66 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER. (Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 1/24/2014). (bgra)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Promontory Interfinancial Network, LLC v. Anova Financial Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anova Financial Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Promontory Interfinancial Network, LLC
Represented By: Brandon Drew Baum
Represented By: Ann Marie Duffy
Represented By: Sharon Audrey Israel
Represented By: Clifford Allan Maier
Represented By: Stephen Edward Noona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.