Global Touch Solutions, LLC v. Motorola Mobility LLC
Plaintiff: Global Touch Solutions, LLC
Defendant: Motorola Mobility LLC
Case Number: 2:2014cv00391
Filed: August 1, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Norfolk Office
County: Fairfax City
Presiding Judge: Raymond A. Jackson
Presiding Judge: Lawrence R. Leonard
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 39 OPINION AND ORDER Granting 16 Motion to Transfer Case. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 6/15/15. Copies distributed to all parties 6/15/15. (ldab, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Global Touch Solutions, LLC v. Motorola Mobility LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Global Touch Solutions, LLC
Represented By: Alan Arthur Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Motorola Mobility LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?