Branscomb v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Linda Branscomb
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 3:2012cv00288
Filed: April 18, 2012
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Office: Richmond Office
County: Accomack
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Payne
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 30, 2013 17 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that the plaintiff's objections to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation are overruled; 14 the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; 8 the plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is denied; 12 the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; and the Commissioner's decision is affirmed. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 1/28/2013. Copies to counsel. (cmcc, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Branscomb v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Linda Branscomb
Represented By: Bruce Knight Billman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By: Robin Perrin Meier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.