Lott v. McHugh et al
Plaintiff: Darrell Ray Lott
Defendant: John McHugh and Fort Lee, Petersburg, Virginia
Case Number: 3:2013cv00172
Filed: March 19, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Richmond Office
County: Nottoway
Presiding Judge: John A Gibney
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr on 6/25/13. Copy sent: Yes(tdai, )
June 10, 2013 Filing 9 NOTICE by Fort Lee, Petersburg, Virginia, John McHugh re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Hambrick, Jonathan)
June 10, 2013 Filing 8 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Fort Lee, Petersburg, Virginia, John McHugh. (Hambrick, Jonathan)
June 6, 2013 Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition to #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Darrell Ray Lott. (jtho, )
May 24, 2013 Filing 6 Roseboro Notice as to Motion to Dismiss by Fort Lee, Petersburg, Virginia, John McHugh (Hambrick, Jonathan)
May 24, 2013 Filing 5 Memorandum in Support re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Fort Lee, Petersburg, Virginia, John McHugh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7)(Hambrick, Jonathan)
May 24, 2013 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Fort Lee, Petersburg, Virginia, John McHugh. (Hambrick, Jonathan)
April 18, 2013 Filing 3 Certificate Reporting Service. Fort Lee, Petersburg, Virginia served on 3/28/2013, answer due 5/28/2013; John McHugh served on 3/28/2013, answer due 5/28/2013. (tdai, )
March 19, 2013 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Fort Lee, Petersburg, Virginia, John McHugh, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Copy of Rule 4 given to Plaintiff when #1 Complaint was filed. Summons mailed by UPS to Plaintiff. (tdai, )
March 19, 2013 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fort Lee, Petersburg, Virginia, John McHugh ( Filing fee $ 350.00, receipt number 34683020429.), filed by Darrell Ray Lott. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Time Sheets, #2 Exhibit - 5 C.F.R. 610.111, #3 Exhibit - Grievance, #4 Exhibit - Work Schedule, #5 Receipt)(tdai, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lott v. McHugh et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darrell Ray Lott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John McHugh
Represented By: Jonathan Holland Hambrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fort Lee, Petersburg, Virginia
Represented By: Jonathan Holland Hambrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?