Richardson v. Superintendent of Piedmont Regional Jail

Respondent: Superintendent of Piedmont Regional Jail
Petitioner: Gregory Richardson
Case Number: 3:2013cv00249
Filed: April 23, 2013
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Office: Richmond Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Payne
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 3, 2014 11 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 1/2/2014. (tjoh, )
March 5, 2014 19 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 3/4/14. (kyou, )(copy mailed to Pro Se party)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richardson v. Superintendent of Piedmont Regional Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Superintendent of Piedmont Regional Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gregory Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.