Smith v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Barbara Ann Smith
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 3:2015cv00246
Filed: April 22, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Richmond Office
County: Richmond City
Presiding Judge: James R. Spencer
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 427
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 16 FINAL ORDER - It is hereby ORDERED that: (1) The Report and Recommendation 13 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court; (2) Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment 7 is GRANTED; (3) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 9 is DENIED; (4) The final decision of the Commissioner is VACATED and REMANDED. Signed by District Judge James R. Spencer on 03/25/2016. (tjoh, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barbara Ann Smith
Represented By: Thomas Bryan Byrne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?