Waller v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Yvonne Waller
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 4:2012cv00131
Filed: August 16, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Newport News Office
County: James City
Presiding Judge: Tommy E. Miller
Presiding Judge: Henry C. Morgan
Nature of Suit: Retirement and Survivors Benefits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 OPINION AND ORDER that the final decision of the Commissioner be AFFIRMED, that 12 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be DENIED, and that 14 Defendant's Motion for SummaryJudgment be GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr on 8/10/2013 and filed on 8/14/2013. (rsim, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Waller v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yvonne Waller
Represented By: Barbara Jean Evans-Yosief
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?