Hawkins v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Sonya Charmaine Hawkins
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 4:2013cv00015
Filed: January 29, 2013
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Office: Newport News Office
County: Hampton City
Referring Judge: Tommy E. Miller
Presiding Judge: Raymond A. Jackson
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 13, 2014 20 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 19 Report and Recommendations; granting 17 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 12 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 1/10/2014. (rsim, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hawkins v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sonya Charmaine Hawkins
Represented By: Barbara Jean Evans-Yosief
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: Mark Anthony Exley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.