Wild v. Gaskins

Wild v. Gaskins

Plaintiff:	Susan Wild
Defendant:	Barbara Gaskins
Case Number:	4:2013cv00070
Filed:	May 28, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office:	Newport News Office
County:	Suffolk City
Presiding Judge:	Raymond A. Jackson
Presiding Judge:	Lawrence R. Leonard
Nature of Suit:	Marine
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 12, 2014	Filing 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying both motions to dismiss. It is further ordered that the parties contact the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case to schedule a settlement conference within 10 days of the entry of this order. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 2/12/14. (afar)
November 14, 2013	Filing 14 ORDER Granting 7 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Plaintiff has failed to allege sufficient facts to satisfy the first prong of the connection test, if taken as true, to establish federal maritime subject-matter jurisdiction; therefo re Defendant's Rule 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is GRANTED without prejudice. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to amend her Compliant within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 11/14/13. Copies distributed to all parties 11/14/13. (ldab, )

Date Filed

Document Text

February 12, 2014

Filing 29 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying both motions to dismiss. It is further ordered that the parties contact the Magistrate Judge assigned to this case to schedule a settlement conference within 10 days of the entry of this order. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 2/12/14. (afar)

November 14, 2013

Filing 14 ORDER Granting 7 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Plaintiff has failed to allege sufficient facts to satisfy the first prong of the connection test, if taken as true, to establish federal maritime subject-matter jurisdiction; therefo re Defendant's Rule 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is GRANTED without prejudice. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave to amend her Compliant within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 11/14/13. Copies distributed to all parties 11/14/13. (ldab, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wild v. Gaskins
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Barbara Gaskins
Represented By:	Jayne Ann Pemberton
Represented By:	William Daniel Prince, IV
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susan Wild
Represented By:	Steven Michael Pavsner
Represented By:	William Wesley Coleman Harty
Represented By:	Darin Lynn Rumer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?