Southern Appalachian Mountain Stewards et al v. A & G Coal Corporation
Sierra Club, Southern Appalachian Mountain Stewards and Appalachian Voices |
A & G Coal Corporation |
2:2012cv00009 |
May 3, 2012 |
US District Court for the Western District of Virginia |
Big Stone Gap Office |
James P. Jones |
Pamela Meade Sargent |
Environmental Matters |
30 U.S.C. ยง 1201 Environment: Review of Agency Action |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 124 OPINION and ORDER granting 120 Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Expenses; A & G Coal Company must pay to the plaintiffs jointly the sum of $175,623.18. Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 10/2/14. (flc) |
Filing 111 OPINION and ORDER granting 104 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 1/31/2014. (flc) |
Filing 95 OPINION AND ORDER denying 81 MOTION to Stay re 77 Opinion filed by A & G Coal Corporation; denying 87 MOTION for Order to Show Cause WHY DEFENDANT SHOULD NOT BE FOUND IN CIVIL CONTEMPT filed by Southern Appalachian Mountain Stewards, Appalachian Voices, Sierra Club. Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 9/13/2013. (lml) |
Filing 77 OPINION and ORDER denying 70 Motion to Supplement Evidence in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 51 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 54 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge James P. Jones on 7/22/13. (flc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.