United States of America v. Schmidt et al
| United States of America |
| Bruno W Schmidt, Charlene O Schmidt and Stevens County Washington |
| 2:2014cv00237 |
| July 22, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
| Spokane Office |
| Stevens |
| Thomas O. Rice |
| Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7403 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
JUDGMENT IN A CIVL ACTION. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. The United States Motion for Summary Judgment ECF No. 60 is GRANTED in part. The Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment ECF No. 61 is DENIED. The United States Motion for Clarification on Claims Tria ble to Jury ECF No. 81 is GRANTED and Motion to Expedite ECF No. 80 is DENIED as moot. The remaining issue (the 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(1)(C) exception to discharge) is set for a bench trial 11/21/2016 at 8:30 a.m. All remaining deadlines contained in the Scheduling Order are stricken. The parties shall file trial briefs by 11/14/2016. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER ON COUNTER DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS. The United States Motion to Dismiss Counterclaimants Schmidts Counterclaims One, Three, Four, and Five ECF No. 49 is GRANTED. Counterclaims one, three, four and five are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Thomas O. Rice. (LLH, Courtroom Deputy)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
