Marks v. State of Washington et al
Tommy S Marks |
State of Washington, Jay Inslee, John Cheeman, Patty Murray, Kath M Rodgers, Rosauers Supermarkets Inc, Bill Squires, Russell VanCamp, David A Condon, Ben Stuckart, Jole McClain and Lonnie Tofsrud |
2:2015cv00095 |
April 7, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington |
Spokane Office |
Spokane |
Stanley A Bastian |
Other Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants Rosauers Supermarkets Inc, State of Washington, Ben Stuckart, Bill Squires, David A Condon, Jay Inslee, John Cheeman, Jole McClain, Kath M Rodgers, Lonnie Tofsrud, Patty Murray, and Russell VanCamp against Plaintiff Tommy S Marks. (cc: Tommy S. Marks via first class mail). (PL, Case Administrator) |
Filing 43 ORDER RE: PENDING MOTIONS; CLOSING FILE; granting 3 Defendant John Cheeman's Motion to Dismiss; granting 6 Washington State Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 18 City of Spokane Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; granting 36 Defendant Rosauers' Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Stanley A Bastian. (PL, Case Administrator) |
Filing 33 ORDER Denying 29 Motion for Oral Argument and Emergency Hearing; 28 Motion to Change Venue (cc: Tommy Marks via first class mail). Signed by Judge Stanley A Bastian. (PL, Case Administrator) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.