State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. Broan-NuTone LLC et al
| State Farm Fire & Casualty Company |
| Broan-NuTone LLC and NuTone Inc |
| 2:2008cv00876 |
| June 3, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tort Product Liability Office |
| King |
| Ricardo S Martinez |
| Defendant |
| Diversity |
| 28:1441 Notice of Removal |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion to Compel. Defendants must produce certain documents within five days of this Order. Counsel are directed to complete a second deposition of Mr. Bakula no later than July 8, 2009. Defendants' motion for a protective order is denied, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(RK)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER granting 13 Stipulated Motion to Amend Case Schedule and Trial Date; Jury Trial is set for 9/28/2009 at 09:00 AM before Judge Marsha J. Pechman. Discovery completed by 6/1/2009, Dispositive motions due by 6/24/2009, Motions in Limine due by 8/31/2009, Agreed Pretrial Order due by 9/2/2009, Trial briefs to be submitted by 9/23/2009, Proposed voir dire/jury instructions due by 9/23/2009, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(VP)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER denying 11 Stipulated Motion. The parties' proposed deadlines do not provide the Court with enough time to consider dispositive motions, by Judge Marsha J. Pechman.(RK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
