Clear Channel Outdoor Inc v Port of Seattle
Plaintiff: Clear Channel Outdoor Inc
Defendant: Port of Seattle
Case Number: 2:2010cv00486
Filed: March 22, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Seattle Office
Presiding Judge: Robert S. Lasnik
Nature of Suit: Condemnation
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 138 ORDER Denying pltf's 79 Motion for Summary Judgment; Granting deft's 80 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying pltf's 113 Motion ; Denying pltf's 22 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(TF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clear Channel Outdoor Inc v Port of Seattle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Port of Seattle
Represented By: John Robert McDowall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clear Channel Outdoor Inc
Represented By: Paul R Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?