XYZ Media, Inc. v. United States Golf Association et al

Plaintiff: XYZ Media, Inc.
Defendant: United States Golf Association and Washington State Golf Association
Case Number: 2:2012cv00989
Filed: June 8, 2012
Court: Washington Western District Court
Office: Seattle Office
County: Whatcom
Presiding Judge: Robert S. Lasnik
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15:1125
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: XYZ Media, Inc. v. United States Golf Association et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: XYZ Media, Inc.
Represented By: William C Rava
Represented By: Nicholas Arnold Manheim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Golf Association
Represented By: Sarah Kathleen Duran
Represented By: Christopher B. Hockett
Represented By: Micah G. Block
Represented By: Bruce EH Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Washington State Golf Association
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.