Lucero v. Cenlar FSB, et al
Leticia Lucero |
Cenlar FSB and Bayview Loan Servicing LLC |
2:2013cv00602 |
April 3, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
Robert S. Lasnik |
Real Property: Other |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 294 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor plaintiff and against defendant in the amount of $213,888. To the extent plaintiff has a contractual or statutory right to attorney's fees, she may file a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(2) by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (RS) |
Filing 255 ORDER GRANTING IN PART CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; granting in part and denying in part dft Cenlar FSB's 215 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part pltf's 227 Motion for Summary Judgment by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS) |
Filing 249 ORDER granting defendants Dobron and Morris' 221 Motion for Summary Judgment; claims against Dobron and Morris are DIMISSMED by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (PM) |
Filing 199 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 140 Motion for Summary Judgment by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(LMK) |
Filing 119 ORDER Granting in Part Bayview's Motion to Dismiss by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. Bayviews 90 motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs RESPA and CPA claims are DISMISSED. Plaintiffs FDCPA claim regarding communications with a represented consumer are DISMISSED with leave to amend. (LMK) |
Filing 107 ORDER GRANTING IN PART CERTAIN DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 82 . The motion to dismiss filed by Cenlar, MERS, Dobron, and Morris is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff's RESPA § 2605(e)(2) claim against Cenlar, part of her FDCPA claim, part of the CPA claim, and theTILA claim are hereby DISMISSED. Plaintiff is hereby granted leave to amend the RESPA and TILA claims. Plaintiff may proceed with discovery regarding all of her other claims against the moving defendants. Plaintiff's request for Rule 11 sanctions is DENIED, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(TM) |
Filing 81 ORDER granting in part and denying in part RCO's 63 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; show cause ddl within 14 days by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS) |
Filing 74 ORDER entering stipulation of plaintiff and RCO Legal PS re deposition of RCO Legal PS by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (RS) |
Filing 30 ORDER regarding 9 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting pltf's 28 Motion for Extension of Time to Amend by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS) |
Filing 18 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. The Clerk is directedto place this Order to Show Cause on the Court's calendar for July 12, 2013. (CL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.