Seaway Properties, LLC v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
Seaway Properties, LLC |
Associated Indemnity Corporation and Fireman's Fund Insurance Company |
2:2013cv00633 |
April 8, 2013 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
Richard A Jones |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 STIPULATED ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. As per the parties' 41 stipulation, the court corrects a single typographical error in the Order on Summary Judgment, docket no. 39 . (CL) |
Filing 39 ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. The court DENIES Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 19 ) except that it rules that Fireman's Fund is not liable to Seaway as a matter of law. The court GRANTS Seaway's cross-motion for pa rtial summary judgment (Dkt. # 26 ) except to the extent that it seeks to hold Fireman's Fund liable. The court sets December 8, 2014 as the trial date. The clerk shall issue a new order resetting the pretrial deadlines that the court vacated. (CL) |
Filing 36 ORDER by Judge Richard A Jones. The court GRANTS the parties' stipulated motion (Dkt. # 35 ) to relieve them of case deadlines pending the court's disposition of their cross-motions for summary judgment. The clerk shall VACATE all pending pretrial deadlines and the trial date. (CL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.