Norman v. Sinclair

Respondent: Steve Sinclair
Petitioner: Omar Ali Norman
Case Number: 2:2013cv00871
Filed: May 16, 2013
Court: Washington Western District Court
Office: Seattle Office
County: King
Referring Judge: James P. Donohue
Presiding Judge: Robert S. Lasnik
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 10, 2014 26 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying petitioner's 22 Motion to Appoint Counsel and 18 motion to amend habeas petition by Hon. James P. Donohue.(RS) cc Norman
June 27, 2014 38 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 36 Objections to Report and Recommendation filed by Omar Ali Norman by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (MD, CC TO PLTF)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Norman v. Sinclair
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Steve Sinclair
Represented By: Paul Douglas Weisser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Omar Ali Norman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.