Strich v. Accelitec, Inc.
| Ronald F Strich |
| Accelitec, Inc. |
| Accelitec, Inc. |
| Ronald F Strich |
| 2:2013cv01092 |
| June 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| XX US, Outside District |
| Robert S. Lasnik |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
JUDGMENT BY COURT; Plaintiff is entitled to judgment on the First Cause of Action in the amount of $1,000,000 in unpaid principal, $240,876.71 in unpaid interest as of June 22, 2013, and prejudgment interest. Plaintiff is entitled to judgment on the Second Cause of Action in the principal amount of $348,000 and interest of $83,596.27 through November 30, 2013, plus prejudgment interest at the contractual rate of 8%. (CL)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER granting in part and denying in part pltf's 32 Motion for Summary Judgment by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS)
|
|
Filing
29
STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (TF)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting in part and denying in part pltf's 8 Motion to Dismiss dft's counterclaims by Judge Robert S. Lasnik.(RS)
|
|
Filing
18
AGREEMENT REGARDING DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION AND ORDER by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (TF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
