Barstad v. Department of Corrections et al
| James Barstad |
| Earl X. Wright, Mike Watkins, Roy Gonzalez, Robert Herzog, Michele Wood, Mark Miller, Todd Fredrickson, Janet Miller and Kari Styles |
| 2:2014cv00523 |
| April 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Robert S. Lasnik |
| Mary Alice Theiler |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION; court adopts the 62 Report and Recommendations, by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (PM) cc: plaintiff
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; pltf's construed motion for summ jgm 25 is denied; dfts' motion for summ jgm 32 is denied in part and granted in part by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (RS)cc pltf
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER granting defendants' 27 Motion for Extension of Dispositive Motions deadline, and renoting plaintiff's 25 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages. The new Noting Date is 10/28/2014. By that date, plaintiff is directed to file with the Court a notice of intention with respect to his request to file an overlength brief. A copy of this Order has been mailed to plaintiff today. Signed by Hon. Mary Alice Theiler.(GB)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; pltf's motion for preliminary injunction is denied by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (RS) cc Barstad
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
