Rodriguez v. Goodenough et al
Alejandro Rodriguez |
Norman Goodenough, Pat Glebe, M Fisher and B Braid |
2:2014cv01167 |
August 1, 2014 |
US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
Seattle Office |
King |
James P. Donohue |
Ricardo S Martinez |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER adopting the 29 Report and Recommendations. This case is Dismissed Without Prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to CR 1, Local Rules W.D. Wash. Defendants' motion for summary Jugment (Dkt. 24) is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan.(CMG; cc to Plaintiff via mail) |
Filing 26 ORDER for Additional Briefing and RE-NOTING the Defendants' 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment TO: 4/10/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (CMG; cc to Plaintiff) |
Filing 19 ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE by 1st Class Mail; mailed to Defendant Braid on 10/29/14. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (CMG; cc to Plaintiff) |
Filing 13 ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE by 1st Class Mail; mailed to Defendants on 10/8/14. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (CMG; cc to Plaintiff w/instruction sheet) |
Filing 8 ORDER that Plaintiff provide the prison trust account statement by 10/24/2014, or advise the Court why he cannot provide the statement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L Strombom. (CMG; cc to plaintiff) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.