Smith et al v. United States of America et al
| Emmett L. Smith and Yesfir Mikhaylik |
| United States of America and Healthpoint |
| 2:2015cv00116 |
| January 26, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Seattle Office |
| King |
| Robert S. Lasnik |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
STIPULATION AND ORDER re parties' 56 Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice; this case is dismissed with prejudice and without costs or fees to either party, signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER re parties' 54 Joint Status Report; all deadlines are stayed for an additional thirty-five (35) days, and the parties shall either dismiss the matter or file an additional Joint Status Report by 7/10/2017, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER re parties' 52 Notice of Settlement and Request to Stay Trial Deadlines; All trial deadlines are stayed for sixty (60) days; Parties shall file a joint status report by June 5, 2017, by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (SWT)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER granting Defendant United States' 37 Unopposed Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The portion of plaintiff's claim that alleges that Dr. Patel violated the standard of care when providing medical treatment to plaintiff in February 2013 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (swt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
