Washington Health Care Association et al v. Dreyfus et al
| Washington Health Care Association, Eagle Healthcare Inc, Washington Care Services, Cashmere Convalescent Center Inc, Soundcare Inc, Nikkei Concerns, Sunrise View Convalescent Center LLC and Tekoa Medical Foundation Inc |
| Susan N. Dreyfus, Kathy Leitch, R Timothy Crandell and William T Stephens |
| 3:2009cv05395 |
| June 30, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Washington |
| Tacoma Office |
| Pierce |
| Ronald B. Leighton |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER granting 59 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Based on Mootness. The Complaint is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton.(DN)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER on STIPULATION re 62 DISMISSING without prejudice and without costs, per Rule 41, Plaintiffs Washington Care Services, Tekoa Medical Foundation Inc, Soundcare Inc, Nikkei Concerns, Washington Health Care Association, Cashmere Convalescent Center Inc, Sunrise View Convalescent Center LLC, Soundcare Inc. These parties have been terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
|
|
Filing
57
STIPULATION AND ORDER STAYING CASEby Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
28
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, signed by Judge Ronald B. Leighton. (DN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
