Cosden v. State of Washington
Petitioner: William E Cosden
Respondent: State of Washington
Case Number: 3:2014cv05739
Filed: September 16, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Washington
Office: Tacoma Office
County: XX US, Outside District
Presiding Judge: Benjamin H. Settle
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER adopting the 36 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Petitioner's habeas petition 23 is DISMISSED as moot. Petitioner's motion to compel 30 is DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Benjamin H. Settle.(CMG; cc to Petitioner at last known address)
June 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER granting 29 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, and the answer filed June 19, 2015 (Dkt. 31) will be considered timely. Signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura.(CMG; cc to Petitioner)
April 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER granting 27 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; Respondent will have until 6/5/2015, to file an answer or other responsive pleading. Signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura.(CMG; cc to Petitioner)
March 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER denying 24 Motion to Appoint Counsel, signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura.(CMG; cc to Petitioner)
February 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER TO RESPOND: within 45 days, Respondent shall file and serve an answer to the Amended Petition in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the US DIstrict Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura. (CMG; cc to Petitioner)
January 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER granting 21 Motion for More Definite Statement and orders petitioner to submit a new petition using hte form provided by the Court. Petitioner's first amended petition must be filed on or before March 6, 2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura.(CMG; cc to Petitioner w/blank petition)
November 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE by 1st Class/Certified Mail/Return Receipt Requested; mailed on 11/14/14 to Respondent & AG's office. Signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura. (CMG; cc to Petitioner w/instruction sheet)
November 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting 15 Motion to Amend Caption: the Clerk's office is directed to change the case captionto reflect that Jeff Uttecht is respondent in this matter. Signed by Magistratre Judge J Richard Creatura.(CMG; cc to Petitioner)
October 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Benjamin H. Settle re 9 Report and Recommendations. (TG; cc mailed to petitioner)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Washington Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cosden v. State of Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: William E Cosden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?