Security Alarm Financing Enterprises, Inc. v. Parmer et al

Plaintiff: Security Alarm Financing Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant: Betty Parmer and Secure US, Inc.
 
Case Number: 1:2012cv00088
Filed: May 22, 2012
 
Court: West Virginia Northern District Court
Office: Clarksburg Office
County: Monongalia
Presiding Judge: Frederick P. Stamp
 
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download.
Date Filed#Document Text
February 21, 2014 127 Featured Case MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE AND DENYING DEFENDANT MITCH BROZIK'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Security Alarm Financing Enterprises, Inc.'s Motion to Strike Secure US, Inc.'s counterclaim 96 is GRAN TED, and Security Alarm Financing Enterprises, Inc.'s Motion in the Alternative to Dismiss the Counterclaim 96 is DENIED AS MOOT. Further, defendant Mitch Brozik's Motion to Dismiss 88 is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr. on 2/21/2014. (copy to counsel of record via CM/ECF) (nmm)
April 14, 2014 144 Featured Case MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE RESPONSE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT BROZIK'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT. The Court denies Security Alarm Financing Enterprises, Inc.'s [1 01] Motion for Summary Judgment; denies Mitch Brozik's 104 Motion for Summary Judgment and denies Security Alarm Financing Enterprises, Inc.'s 118 Motion to Strike memorandum of Secure US, Inc. purporting to join in Mitch Brozik's motion for summary judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 4/14/14. (mh)
February 15, 2013 66 Featured Case MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT SECURE US, INC.S 11 MOTION TO DISMISS, GRANTING DEFENDANT BETTY PARMERS 21 MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT,DENYING PLAINTIFFS 20 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS MOOT AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS 32 MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT. Clerk directed to file amended complaint. Plaintiff directed to serve the amended complaint. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 2/15/13. (cc)
October 31, 2013 84 Featured Case MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT MITCH BROZIKS 75 MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT on or before November 21, 2013. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 10/31/2013. (kac)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Security Alarm Financing Enterprises, Inc. v. Parmer et al
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Security Alarm Financing Enterprises, Inc.
Represented By: Gregory J. Krock
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Betty Parmer
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Secure US, Inc.
Represented By: Brandon J. Kupec
Represented By: Thomas W. Kupec
Search Blogs [ Justia BlawgSearch | Google Blogsearch ]
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]