Jones et al v. Consolidation Coal Company
| James D. Jones, II, Janet L. Jones and Timothy E. Jones |
| Consolidation Coal Company and Consol Energy, Inc. |
| Consolidation Coal Company |
| Janet L. Jones, Timothy E. Jones and James D. Jones, II |
| 1:2013cv00011 |
| January 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
| Clarksburg Office |
| Marion |
| Irene M. Keeley |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY ON DAMAGES AS IT PERTAINS TO THE $300,000.00 CLAIM AND CONFIRMING PRONOUNCED ORDER OF THE COURT GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO REO RDER AND BIFURCATE: It is ORDERED that Defendant's 55 Motion in limine as it relates to the Plaintiff's contention for $300,000.00 in damages is denied in part. It is further ORDERED that Defendant's 56 Motion in Limine to Reorder and Bifurcate is granted. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 3/27/14. (cnd) Modified relationship on 3/27/2014 (cnd).
|
|
Filing
81
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AS FRAMED DEFENDANTS 55 MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE PLAINTIFFS TESTIMONY REGARDING VALUATION OF COAL MINE OR USE OF SUBSURFACE AND DEFERRING RULING ON $300,000.00 CLAIM OF DAMAGES. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 3/19/14. (jss)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
