Goldsmith v. Perdue

Plaintiff: Robert Goldsmith
Defendant: R. A. Perdue
Case Number: 3:2013cv00048
Filed: May 3, 2013
Court: West Virginia Northern District Court
Office: Martinsburg Office
County: Gilmer
Referring Judge: James E. Seibert
Presiding Judge: Gina M. Groh
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 22, 2013 38 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER to seal. Because Dkt.# [35-4] contains confidential information relative to the plaintiff, the records should be sealed. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Seibert on 10/22/13. copy mailed to pro se pla. via cert. return rec't mail (njz) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/22/2013: # 1 Certified Mail Return Receipt) (njz).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Goldsmith v. Perdue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Goldsmith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. A. Perdue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.