U.S. Bank National Association v. Sayona Hospitality, LLC
U.S. Bank National Association |
Sayona Hospitality, LLC |
FAWV Associates LLC |
3:2014cv00062 |
June 19, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia |
Martinsburg Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Gina M. Groh |
Robert W. Trumble |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: granting 6 Motion to Appoint Receiver: FAWV Associates LLC appointed; granting 10 Motion for Entry of Consent Order Appointing Receiver; adopting Report and Recommendations re 11 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Gina M. Groh on 6/26/14. (njz) Modified on 6/26/2014-corrected text (njz). |
Filing 11 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 10 MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT ORDER APPOINTING RECEIVER filed by U.S. Bank National Association, and 6 Emergency MOTION to Appoint Receiver filed by U.S. Bank National Association. RECOMMENDATION: t hat Plaintiffs 6 Emergency Motionfor Immediate Appointment of Receiver be GRANTED and that Plaintiffs 10 Motion for Entry of Consent Order Appointing Receiver be GRANTED and that the District Judge enter the Consent Order Appointing Receiver alon g with Exhibit A 10 1&2 as submitted. Objections to R&R due by 6/26/2014 at 5:00 pm. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert W. Trumble on 6/25/2014. (cwm) (Main Document 11 replaced on 6/25/2014) (cwm). Modified to regenerate NEF after document replaced per Magistrate Judge Trumble 6/25/2014 (cwm). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.