Davis v. United States Department of Justice Executive Office for United States Attorneys
||United States Department of Justice Executive Office for United States Attorneys
||August 26, 2008
||West Virginia Northern District Court
||Freedom of Information Act Office
||James E. Seibert
||Frederick P. Stamp
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
||05:552 Freedom of Information Act
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 14, 2009
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: For the reasons stated, the undersigned recommends that defendant's 20 Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED, the plaintiff's 24 Motion for Summary Judgment be DENIED, and the 1 Complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Objections to R&R due within ten (10) days of receipt of this R&R. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Seibert on 7/14/2009. (Copy to pro se plaintiff (via certified mail/rrr), Judge Stamp, counsel) (kac) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/14/2009: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt) (kac).
|September 21, 2009
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AFFIRMING AND ADOPTING 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE: granting 20 defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 24 plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. The plaintiff's co mplant is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This civil action is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket of this court. Clerk directed to enter judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P Stamp, Jr on 9/21/09. (c to pro se plaintiff by certified mail) (cc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/21/2009: # 1 Certified mail receipt) (cc).
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.