Harris v. Change, Inc.

Plaintiff: Karen Harris
Defendant: Change, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2012cv00118
Filed: July 25, 2012
Court: West Virginia Northern District Court
Office: Wheeling Office
County: Brooke
Presiding Judge: John Preston Bailey
Referring Judge: James E. Seibert
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28:1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 9, 2013 74 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER GRANTING 57 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: The case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the matter dropped from the active docket of the Court. Accordingly, the plaintiffs pending Motion for Additional Mediation [Doc. 63], is hereby DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge John Preston Bailey on 10/9/2013. (kac) (Copy to pro se plaintiff (via cm/rrr))

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. Change, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karen Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Change, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas E. Buck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.